by Deborah Lagarde for Omegazine!

Last month for OmegaZine I wrote an article in two parts on how popular counterculture since the sixties has been used by "they"--that is, the power elites--to socially engineer the world's youth into accepting their hidden agenda, in particular, the use of drugs and moral degradation so as to make it easier for us to accept what they have in store for us in the next century. To back up my claims that counter culture is part of their "conspiracy" I cited several pages from Dr. John Coleman's book "The Conspirator's Hierarchy: The Committee of 300," published by American West Publishers (note: it was very fortunate I was able to download it; the web site I downloaded it from, Wiretap.Spies.com seems now to be "not accepting connections or may be busy. Try again later.") There is no reason to doubt the accuracy of Coleman's work, for he has been a British Secret Service agent who has, as part of his work, access to highly secret documents and sources as well with that kind of access, including sources at Tavistock, the institution which has, apparently, worked up much of this counterculture with which "they" plan to enslave our minds. Also, I have a friend, formerly of DEA, who can verify many of Coleman's facts.

Anything, even the music I grew up with, rock music, which is intended to be used for social engineering or mental slavery, must be opposed by any thinking free individual, but with caution. Not all rock music is harmful, for sure. Not all rock stars are drug dealers, and not all of them are devil worshippers. What you have to watch for is "whom does this music serve? Whom does this song or band serve?" For instance, everyone who lived in the late sixties is familiar with the Steppenwolf song, "The Monster." That song just happens to be a theme song for a politically incorrect radio show on WWCR Friday nights, one which recently interviewed Congressman Bob Barr of Georgia on the Clinton Impeachment Trial Proceedings. The "Monster" referred to, of course, is the power elites, which, thanks to ex-president Bush, has now been identified as "The New World Order." (Hey, I know that term is overused, but what the hey--most now know whom I am talking about at least.) It is interesting to note here too that Steppenwolf, which strangely enough became superbig on the counter culture scene quickly and just as quickly "left" the scene, also recorded "The Pusher," an anti-drug song as well as an anti-drug dealer song (were they trying to tell their colleagues something?). Could it be Steppenwolf had to "leave" the scene before too many young folks started taking this anti-drug stuff too seriously? Another group which mysteriously "disappeared" recorded a song called "The Smell", another anti-drug song on how drugs affect your body--was the "plane crash" that killed Lynard Skynard just an "accident"? Was reggae star Peter Tosh, who advocated legalizing marijuana but who was opposed to mind-controlling drugs like heroin, murdered by "accident?" Was his buddy, Bob Marley, a victim of "cancer" by "accident"? As I suggested last month, did Brian Jones and several other rock stars "OD" by accident? And I can't get over the feeling John Lennon's assassination wasn't just a "lone crazed killer," that it was actually part of "their" agenda.

Call me nuts, or a "lone crusader" for a truly agenda-free counterculture. But it rackles me to find that the so-called "rebellion" by "rebel" rockers was thought up in a think tank by ivory tower white-coat "suits." It's like we, my generation and younger, have been stripped of our way of life, laid bare to be nothing but socially engineered robots. I don't know about you, but this nonsense is serious enough to be exposed as a plot to control our minds. The same crowd that lets a Satanic Marilyn Manson run around spreading "Anti-Christ Superstar" and the notion that Christians need to be done away with is the same crowd who I know can carry out this kind of enslavement. "They" need to be be exposed, Yessiree!

But does anyone really care if their minds are being controlled--so long as they don't realize it? One of the techniques, as Coleman pointed out in the beginning of his book, that "they" use is hiding their agenda of mind control/social engineering by putting it in plain view. Make a TV show or movie about it. Most folks assume that TV shows and movies are fiction, right? I'd mentioned a movie starring William Shatner called, "The Tenth Level" in my last month's article, about a mind control experiment. That movie was based on an actual Tavistock experiment run by Harvard Psychological Clinic, a branch of Tavistock, but since it was done up as a movie, who would have supposed such stuff was really going on? A better example is the TV show "Dark Skies," which had been originally on CBS, was cancelled, and is now back on the Sci-Fi Channel. This is the show about an FBI operative, John Lowengard, and his wife, who, in the process of tracking down UFO conspiracies have stumbled on the real conspiracies to cover-up real UFO activity, the assasinations of JFK and RFK, etc. What is suggested is these really are conspiracies run by the highest levels of our govt. and will lead to our eventual enslavement. But, when presented strictly as entertainment, who can but scoff at such notions? And, take "Star Trek." This is perhaps the granddaddy of them all. Forget the fact that the show refers to the 23rd century. Who can doubt that what is advocated here is one-world government, under the benevolent guise of "The United Federation of Planets?" Ever see the "UFP" symbol? Looks remarkably like the United Nations symbol, eh? Who can fail to see that two or three generations of "Trekkies" is a small scale brainwashing for a one-world-govt. led by the UN and run by the power elites? But, seen by most a purely entertainment, who can but see that such a devious plot is, in fact, beneficial and "for our own good"? (Tell that to Kosovo, Bosnia, Iraq etc.). Another great example, and one Americans need to open their eyes to, was the beginning of "Robocop Three." There was the scene that showed whole neighborhoods being displaced from their homes forcibly so that the Detroit power elite (OCP) could tear the neighborhood down and put up a shiny new neighborhood--remember that all those displaced people were put into a concentration camp and murdered? Think it couldn't happen here and now?

Remember "Red Dawn" and "Amerika"? In both, one a movie and the other a mini-series, the United States is invaded by Russia/UN forces under the guise of "peacekeeping". Like "Robocop 3," "Amerika" has an interesting beginning, where the hero of the mini-series has just been released from a concentration camp. The location? Fort Davis, Texas, home to yours truly, and site of the April-May1997 "Republic of Texas" Standoff--which I lived through and which was martial law instituted in a mountain residential subdivision, to the point where occupied and unoccupied residences were broken into by law enforcement for purposes of "quartering troops" in violation of the 4th Amendment.... Pure entertainment, right? So how come Russian tanks, as well as German munitions, have been moving north through Fort Bliss in El Paso, Texas? I have seen this! The Germans, by the way, control an air force base in New Mexico. So how come, as part of Clinton's China Chicanery, Communist China now controls a naval base near Santa Monica, California? So they can sell their action figure toys here? Gimme a break! So how come a friend of mine, traveling home from El Paso over the holidays and just outside of the tiny town of Sierra Blanca--home of the nation's biggest toxic waste treatment project--saw a car with a Texas license plate being ticketed by a policeman who was driving a car signified by a symbol that he was MEXICAN POLICE(!!), the signification IN SPANISH and license plate of CHIHUAHUA STATE, MEXICO! Just what are cops FROM MEXICO doing in the United States handing out traffic tickets?!?

But as long as stuff like this is just done up as entertainment, who will care to notice that we really are about to lose all our freedoms, the most important of which are speech, thought and religion. In the real world, and, goodness gracious, even in the virtual world. The Internet, the truly last bastion of freedom of speech, thought, and religion, is ready to come under power elite assault. (And Fox Sci-fi Channel has done this angle up to boot in their movie, Tom Clancy's "Net Force.") Now I will cite another article from that wonderful web site, World Internet News Distributary Source, which states that the US govt (which, by the way, really controls the US end of the internet) is planning on setting up an "Internet Upgrade" which will be strictly controlled, disallowing anything "politically incorrect". From the article called " 'Internet Too Dangerous--Must Be Controlled' says FBI Source":

President Clinton has proposed steps which will help pave the way for the NEXT GENERATION OF THE INTERNET. The plan calls for the government to spend up to $650 million on upgrades which could make the system 100 to 1,000 times faster than the present one. "Let us reach for the goal in the 21st century of every home connected to the Internet", Clinton said.

The real agenda? Read on...

One might ask why the government would have sufficient interest in the Internet to invest up to $650 million in the NEXT GENERATION INTERNET? Do they, too, see its value and its threat to their designs? A recent statement by an unnamed source from the FBI puts this entire question in perspective. "There must be some control imposed on the Internet, it is too dangerous in its present unrestricted and unregulated state." In keeping with the FBI concerns regarding the "dangerous" level of freedom of information is a statement by Council on Foreign Relations member Lawrence Eagleburger, "We have to be the world's THOUGHT policemen", he said. (Note: the Council on Foreign Relations is one of the secret societies spoken of by Coleman as being under the umbrella of the power elite Committee of 300--ed.)

���� Another group which advocates changes to the Internet is New Century Network, a collection of large nationwide media publishing giants. They assume a more casual stance, speaking of the need for EDITORS, AGENTS, and FILTERS to improve the quality of the Internet experience. "That's where we come in", they say, with a plan to "marry the interactivity, breadth, and cool conversation, with the 'credibility' and dedicated insight of the home town newspaper. We're a venture of 9 media companies which together own 225 daily newspapers around the U.S. Our owners are:

* ADVANCE PUBLISHING.INC., COX NEWSPAPERS INC., GANNET CO. INC., THE HEARST CORP., KNIGHT-RIDDER INC., THE NEW YORK TIMES CO., TIMES-MIRROR INC., TRIBUNE CO., THE WASHINGTON POST CO.

���� Each of these companies has a rich and fascinating history, and each has played a SIGNIFICANT ROLE IN SHAPING AMERICAN SOCIETY as we know it today. Most of all we intend to SHAPE and DEVELOP [ the Internet] CONTENT so the...result is a CIVILIZED net experience. For these reasons we call ourselves an interactive CONTENT DEVELOPMENT and distribution company."

���� New Century Network is precisely accurate in their revealing self assessment. They have in fact "PLAYED A SIGNIFICANT ROLE IN SHAPING AMERICAN SOCIETY." But is this the true function of the free press, SHAPING SOCIETY? (Read: Socially Engineer Society--ed.) This admission is a serious indictment of the media and is a revelation oftheir real intent. These are the tactics used by socialist governments to implement their agenda. Quoting from the book "The Great Deceit" [Veritas Foundation study], Archibald Roosevelt states: "Socialists have infiltrated our schools, our law courts, our government, our MEDIA OF COMMUNICATIONS." The study went on to say that "the Socialist movement is made up of a relatively small number of people who have developed the TECHNIQUE OF INFLUENCING large masses of people to a VERY HIGH DEGREE."

Does any of this sound like social engineering? Read on...

John Swinton, a former Chief of Staff at the NEW YORK TIMES, was asked to give a toast before the prestigious New York Press Club in 1953. Swinton was called 'the dean of his profession' by other newsmen who admired him greatly. He made this candid confession:

���� 'There is no such thing, at this date of the world's history, as an independent press. You know it and I know it. There is not one of you who dares to write your honest opinions, and if you did, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinions out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for similar things, and any of you who would be so foolish as to write your honest opinions would be out on the streets looking for another job. If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper, before twenty-four hours my occupation would be gone. The business of the journalist is to destroy the truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of mammon [money], and to sell his country for his daily bread. You know it and I know it and what folly is this toasting an independent press. We are the tools and vassals of the rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes.' " Shillum, 1996.

���� The forces opposed to a free and open Internet speak in terms of "improving the Internet experience", by the use of CONTENT DEVELOPMENT, EDITORS, FILTERS, CREDIBILITY, SHAPING CONTENT, ETC, ETC. The Internet is the last and only medium of communication which until this time has not been edited, regulated, censored, shaped or controlled. It is now only a matter of time; the powers that control society will not permit so dangerous an element to remain unbridled. We can expect the NEXT GENERATION INTERNET which the government is so generously supporting, to be a regulated, controlled and useful tool of the New World Order. It will cease to be an avenue for true inquiry, but, instead will be an educational and indoctrination device. Therefore, the President has set for his goal- "every home in America connected to the Internet in the 21st century."

But, of course, who will notice?